Comments on: Churchill juror slams judge’s ruling on reinstatement

By: Serve the People

Serve the People — Sun, 02 Aug 2009 00:57:05 +0000

You can’t expect justice from the kangaroo kourts of Amerikkka. There are no rights, only power struggles.

By: Anita

Anita — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:13:55 +0000

What they’re dragging her through almost gives you an incentive to refuse to serve on a jury. It wasn’t like she volunteered and competed to be there.

By: Ben

Ben — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:16:06 +0000

Yeah, I’m a CU grad as well, and I take a special satisfaction in telling their telemarketers to go to hell.

By: stratman351

stratman351 — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:02:51 +0000

Naves should be removed from the bench. The CU Regents operate as a legal body like our district courts do. Right? Ward can’t sue CU because they act in a similiar fashion to our courts. What a crock! This ruling was ludicrous. But it doesn’t stop here. Naves should have instructed the jury to return to deliberation in order to come up with a settlement figure. He should never have allowed the jury to find CU guilty but only award him a dollar. He obviously has a bias against Ward. I can only hope Ward wins on appeal. I’m a CU alumni and they won’t get another dime from me ever again.